A beautiful healthy baby a week before she was abducted.
by Jamie Sullivan
Hello, I am Delonna Sullivan and I died while in foster care on April 11, 2011. I was 4 months old.
I want to tell you what happened to me through my mother, Jamie Sullivan because I can’t tell you and you should know so you can protect your children.
On April 5, 2011, about 9:00 a.m. there was a knock at our door. Two child care persons and an RCMP officer were there with apprehension Orders ...for the children of my mother’s female roommate. They took the roommate’s children and then demanded me from my mother. I was scared and didn’t want to go. As I looked into my mother’s eyes I was pleading with her not to let them take me but there were three of them and my mother could not battle all three while holding me. They took me to their car, but they didn’t even have a car seat for me. Why didn’t the RCMP officer stop them then? To keep me safe my mother loaned them my car seat.
They took me to a strange place. I could hear my mother and my grandmother pleading with them to let her or my grandmother look afer me. They refused.
I was taken to a strange home and put into the arms of a strange woman. The food she fed me tasted different, I got diarrhea within one day.
I was allowed to visit my mother and grandmother two days after I was taken for less than one hour. It felt wonderful to be in my mother’s arms again, but my bum was sore. My mom and grandmom noticed that I had diarrhea and that I had dried feces on my bottom. They also pointed out that I had a diaper rash for the 1st time in my life and had red marks on my head. Both mom and grandmom told the strange woman that I should be taken to see a doctor. The strange woman said that if the diarrhea didn’t clear up in a few days she would make an appointment for me to be seen by a doctor.
I was taken away again. I cried for my mom and because my bum hurt. Nobody would listen. I was finally taken to a hospital the following Monday about 2:00 p.m. I died about 4:00 p.m. on April 11, 2011. Nobody told my mom I was dying.
When my mom was told at about 10:00 p.m. that I had died, she immediately came to see me. She held me one last time for awhile and then laid me down to rest forever.
http://www.pa-pa.ca/Edmonton%20mother.html
ReplyDeleteHere's more info.
Random Bystander, thank you for this link.
ReplyDeleteCrimes against Children
ReplyDeleteDelonna is a true profile of wrongly being taking away from a good parent for the interest of “the big corporations”
Why would a Child protective Services want to take a child without checking, double checking, and triple checking when no sign of abuse, neglect is in view. When Children’s Aid apprehends children they need to be right on, because if they are wrong the innocent children become needlessly victims.
Who would do this, and why?
Would it be, “The arrogance of Child Protective Services officials in Alberta, “for the best interest of profit and shareholders”
This case clearly shows that government and corporations are more than willing to harm, and allow children to be killed in order to complete their “Pot of Gold”
Delonna was not a surprise or a shock for many of us, but it was a painful reminder that the public need to know more about the kind of corporations, people or person that can commit such act is an act of pure evil.
this awful.it will not bring her back but the mom should sue the pants(and houses)off of them.enough money that it hurts & they will think twice.even if they had reason to remove the child the baby died in their care.she should have been called immediately to the hospital.
ReplyDeleteThe Business of Children - A Billion $ Growth Industry
ReplyDelete. The average of Children Protectice Services worker is female, single and childless. The majority have no relevant formal qualifications in social work or child care. The completion of secondary school is the only firm requisite. New hires receive some basic training, and then given the powers and mandate to seize children.
With jobs and pensions for life, 37.5 hour work weeks, paid vacations, etc. conditions unmatched in the private sector, recruits are easy to find. Monday to Friday work weeks, from 9am to 5pm, insure that children held in custody receive no attention, services or parental visits for weeks, particularly during holidays or weekends during which children are held incommunicado. Children’s Aid workers receive promotions based on their record of seizing children.
A Legacy of State Child Abuse
ReplyDeleteBeginning with the forced institutionalization of native children in the 1930's,40's and, 50's, followed by the systematic abuse and torture of 1000's of children known as the Duplesis Orphans, and then to the present day abuse, the cycle of destruction has been repeated with every generation of children in Canada for the past 70 years. The attack on parents has created lucrative work for the army of government bureaucrats, lawyers, judges, psychologists and aid workers etc. For decades, all system participants are paid by the omnipresent state, effectively linking the financial and career interests of bureaucrats and the judicial system. The lack of judicial independence has lead to a culture of flagrant corruption and impunity maintained by a conspiracy of silence. The system is a direct contributor to suicide among youth, and men.
The systematic removal of children from parents and the breakup of families creates millions of victims amongst siblings, parents and extended family. Raised without the unconditional love of parents and the family ties critical to identity and culture, victims leave the system emotionally shattered, drug and alcohol dependent, and lacking the role models, education, and skills to function in modern society. Forced out of institutions and onto the streets at the age of 18, the majority become suicide statistics or non-contributing, dependent members of society.
Crimes against Nature, Psychological Torture, Intimidation and Provocation
ReplyDeletePhysical intimidation is used to provoke parents and children. In court sessions, after months of no contact with children, workers will place themselves between parents and their young, denying any intimacy or opportunity to talk. Emotional reactions to provocation is presented as evidence of the unsuitability of parents and continued reclusion of children. Parents who obey the rules, remain unemotional and refuse their children's calls are portrayed as distant, uncaring and unworthy of caring for their children. If children behave while in custody, the Children's Aid will argue that they should not be disturbed and kept in custody. If children begin acting out because of emotional stress, deliberately provoked, they will then be held for further "treatment". The forced administration of potent drugs to "correct" the emotional states of children is standard practice.in canada.
A frequent tactic is to deny parents all contact with children for months or years at a time, directly or through family and friends. Any contact with distraught children is presented in the courts as evidence of disobedience and defiance of the court and/or the Children's Aid grounds for further punishment and separation of children from parents.
The Children’s Aid
ReplyDeleteWe have witnessed for decades a shift away from “the best interest of the child” to “the best interest of the corporation or agency”. This mentality is threatening the welfare of children. Profits and the interests of the corporation now triumph. Deregulation, privatization, weak enforcement of existing regulations and legal and political resistance to new regulations have worn out our ability as a society, to protect children.
To silence complaints of corruption and abuse in the treatment of children, the government, with no public debate or inquire, has increased the powers of the Children’s Aid and accelerated the programs of permanent institutionalization and forced adoption of children.
Children seized are selected from parents considered vulnerable or achieve - those least able to resist. Parents who have suffered accident, illness, separation, divorce, and those deemed marginal in lifestyle (home schoolers), are preferred targets. Well adjusted children are preferred candidates, as they are easier to warehouse and make better adoption candidates. In order to insure continued funding of Children’s Protection Services and judicial budgets, the placement with extended family or relatives is blocked.
The workers using a police escort arrive at homes or schools to seize children. Naive parents are told that the children will be taken temporarily for evaluation, never to be returned. Court warrants are rubber stamped by court clerks without any proof presented. In many cases, children are seized without warrants, though the use of document and signature fraud.
Parents who resist the seizure of their children are charged with assault. This is then presented to the courts as proof of their unsuitability as parents. Parents who do not resist are presented to courts as detached, uncaring, unloving and emotional unit, grounds used to institutionalize or forcibly adopt children.
Once children are in state custody, often in isolation cells, the inquisition and character assassination of parents in secret trials begins. With no burden of proof and with total impunity, collusion, corruption, fraud and psychological torture are systematically used to break parents-child bonds and create the distress used to justify the continued detention of children. Most children taken are never again released to birth parents. Parents and others who resist, including those working in the system, who attempts appeals, reveal corruption, or file complaints, are intimidated, silenced and subject to judicial and bureaucratic harassment.